Sunday, February 13, 2011

Wikileaks: US embassy cables Vietnam picks its new leaders


    US embassy cables: Vietnam picks its new leaders
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 12 January 2011 12.14 GMT

Cable sent: 10/09/2009

CO N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 HANOI 000809
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2019/09/10

TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PHUM, ECON, ETRD, VM

SUBJECT: 2011 LEADERSHIP TRANSITION: LEADING CONTENDERS FOR GENERAL SECRETARY AND PRIME MINISTER

REF: HANOI 60 (FEW CHANGES AT THE 9TH PARTH PLENUM)

HANOI 330 (IDEOLOGY RESURGENT? THE GENERAL SECRETARY'S NEW CONCEPT AND ITS IMPLICATIONS)
HANOI 413 (IN VIETNAM, CHINA AND BAUXITE DON'T MIX)
HANOI 537 (BAUXITE CONTROVERSY SPURS LEADERSHIP DIVISIONS, VIBRANT NATIONAL ASSEMBLY DEBATE)
HANOI 672 (BEHIND VIETNAM'S LATEST CRACKDOWN)

CLASSIFIED BY: Michael Michalak, Ambassador; REASON: 1.4(B), (D)

1. (C) SUMMARY: Preparations are already underway for major leadership changes in Vietnam as the Communist Party gears up for its Eleventh Party Congress in January 2011. As many as six of the Politburo's fifteen members are expected to retire, including the General Secretary, State President, and National Assembly Chair. Conventional wisdom identifies CPV Standing Secretary Truong Tan Sang and Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung as the frontrunners to replace Nong Duc Manh as General Secretary. If Dung does not become General Secretary, odds are he will remain as Prime Minister. Politburo members since 1996, Dung and Sang have amassed unparalleled influence in Vietnam's Party-state apparatus; they are arguably the two most powerful political figures in the country today. The problem is that, though rivals, Dung and Sang are also too alike for comfort -- both are Southerners, both former HCMC Party Secretaries. Vietnam's enduring regionalism argues that one, likely Sang, will be frustrated in 2011. If Dung keeps his seat as PM, the two strongest contenders for General Secretary are current National Assembly Chair Nguyen Phu Trong and -- more radically -- the Politburo's newest member, the conservative head of the CPV Ideology and Education Commission, To Huy Rua.

2. (C) COMMENT: Neither PM Dung nor Standing Secretary Sang is a champion of political reform in the manner of the late PM Vo Van Kiet. But they are known commodities: pragmatic, market-oriented, and in favor of steady, incremental advances in Vietnam's relationship with the United States. Trong has adopted a similar approach as NA Chair. Rua may be a different story altogether. His elevation to the Politburo both reflects and reinforces a hard-line trend that has been increasingly evident since the crackdown on journalists reporting on the PMU-18 corruption scandal almost exactly one year ago. What role he plays in Vietnam's leadership transition will say much about whether political liberalization -- on hold for now -- will resume after 2011 or will remain stifled. END SUMMARY AND COMMENT.

Preparations Underway for the 2011 Party Congress

--------------------------------------------- ----

3. (C) Unlike the Ninth Party Plenum, which installed new members of the CPV Politburo, Secretariat, and Central Committee (ref. A), the Tenth Plenum, held this July, produced virtually no new personnel or policy decisions. Instead, according to contacts with access to the Central Committee, the Plenum focused mainly on preparations for the Eleventh Party Congress in 2011. Following the Plenum, the CPV announced that the once-every-five-year Congress would be held January 2011, a somewhat earlier date than usual to allow for National Assembly elections later in the year. More importantly, our contacts said that the Congress finished assignments to various subcommittees, including bodies responsible for drafting the Congress's main written product, the "Political Report." Initial drafting on some of the sections, including the portion on Vietnam's foreign relations, began several months ago, according to XXXXXXXXXXXX.

4. (C) Of the subcommittees, the one subject to most fervid speculation is the Subcommittee for Personnel Appointments. Chaired officially by General Secretary Nong Duc Manh, but under the day-to-day supervision of the Central Committee's Organizational Affairs Department Chair, Ho Duc Viet, this subcommittee is charged with preparing the list of candidates for the Eleventh Central Committee and, ultimately, the next Politburo. Viet began the formal process at a "national conference" in Hanoi, August 25-26, in which he instructed grass-roots cadres to begin organizing local and Provincial- level Party Congresses. The actual work of the Appointments Subcommittee is kept extremely

HANOI 00000809 002 OF 004

close hold, particularly as it affects upper-level personnel, and will be subject to change until the Tenth Central Committee's final plenary session, immediately before the January 2011 Congress itself. As a sign that ideological conservatives continue to consolidate their position, the Subcommittee will take as its guidance directives put forward in the Ninth Plenum, including admonitions about the pernicious effects of Western-oriented "self-evolution" (ref. B), sources familiar with the Plenum's internal deliberations say. Additionally, the Tenth Plenum instructed Provincial Party Secretaries to compile reports explaining how changes over the past ten years had either contributed to "perfecting socialism" or "regressing into capitalism," according to the new Can Tho Party Secretary.

Retirements Will Leave Key Openings

----------------------------------

5. (SBU) The Personnel Subcommittee will have several important vacancies to consider. The CPV's Ninth Congress (2001) established an age limit of 60 for first-time Politburo members and 65 for those returning for a repeat term. The latter limit was increased to 67 just prior to the Tenth Congress as an exception to allow Manh, who at the time was 66, to return as General Secretary. Nearly all of our contacts predicted the present leadership would adhere to these age limits in 2011. If the limits are respected, five key Politburo members face mandatory retirement: General Secretary Manh (age 71 in 2011), State President Nguyen Minh Triet (69), National Assembly Chair Nguyen Phu Trong (67), DPM and Foreign Minister Pham Gia Khiem (67), and DPM Truong Vinh Trong (69). In addition, a sixth member of the Politburo, CPV Inspection Commission Chair Nguyen Van Chi, will be 66 and is reported to be in extremely poor health. A minority view among our contacts held that the 67-year age exception would be extended to NA Chair Trong if he were selected as General Secretary.

Consensus Front Runners: Truong Tan Sang and Nguyen Tan Dung

--------------------------------------------- ---------------

6. (C) Most observers identify PM Nguyen Tan Dung and the head of the powerful CPV Secretariat, Standing Secretary Truong Tan Sang, as the leading contenders for Secretary General in 2011. In terms of experience, authority, and potential career longevity, Dung and Sang stand head and shoulders above their counterparts on the Politburo. Both have achieved dominant positions in what many now consider almost as competing wings within the Party- state apparatus: Dung through the Office of Government, government ministries, and his control over Vietnam's largest state-owned enterprises; Sang through the Central Committee Commissions. Dung and Sang are also in the best position to provide the continuity of leadership that the Party has consistently said it needs. The two entered the Politburo in 1996, which gives them the longest tenure of any member likely to serve through 2011. At the same time, at 60, they are relatively young and would be eligible to serve two terms as General Secretary, were the 67-year age-limit exemption invoked.

7. (C) Of the two, Sang is more frequently mentioned as a replacement for GS Manh. As Standing Secretary, Sang is responsible for the day-to-day running of Party affairs and, our contacts say, has consolidated his hold over the CPV's Central Committee commissions, which retain an important role in setting broad policy goals and in personnel decisions. Though his tenure as HCMC Party Chief was somewhat tainted by the "Nam Cam" organized crime scandal, Sang is now widely acknowledged as the Party's primary power broker on a wide range of issues, including on economic matters. Meeting with a delegation of industry representatives from the U.S.-ASEAN Business Council in May, for example, Sang was able to comment authoritatively, in detail and without notes, on topics ranging from civilian nuclear cooperation to energy pricing to regulations on tenders and procurement. Sang has also intervened to stop, at least temporarily, several business

HANOI 00000809 003 OF 004

deals that were rumored to be corrupt and that had aroused public criticism.

8. (C) Sang has in some respects already eclipsed the General Secretary, according to XXXXXXXXXXXX. Others agree that Manh has ceded authority to Sang, but offer a slightly different interpretation. XXXXXXXXXXXX emphasized that Manh himself remains in overall command, but has removed himself from most policy decisions, choosing instead to focus on internal Party building. Ambassador Mitsuo Sakaba, who accompanied Manh on his April visit to Japan, told us that the General Secretary appeared disengaged in his meeting with Japanese PM Taro Aso, reading verbatim and in a monotone a 30-minute prepared statement passed to him by a staff-member; the General Secretary only really showed interest when he was taken to an agricultural site outside Tokyo. Whatever the cause of Manh's detachment, our contacts agree that Sang has already assumed many of Manh's normal responsibilities as General Secretary.

9. (C) While PM Dung has frequently been mentioned as a contender for General Secretary, a series of setbacks may have frustrated his ambitions to ascend to the top spot. Dung appears to have been stung by criticisms over his early advocacy for Chinese investment in bauxite projects in the Central Highlands (ref. C), a controversy that has been led publicly by General Vo Nguyen Giap, but which insiders say has been exploited by Sang and others as a proxy to undermine Dung (ref. D). In the most recent Plenum, the Prime Minister reportedly also came under criticism for his government's poor performance on corruption, education, and health care. Ultimately, Dung's biggest weakness is the simple fact that his power base derives from efforts to strengthen the government/ state, according to contacts such as XXXXXXXXXXXX. Dung's efforts to consolidate power within the Office of Government have alienated many in the Secretariat and the commissions of the Central Committee, the CPV's traditional centers of power, according to Eastern European diplomatic contacts with regular exposure to the upper/middle ranks of the CPV hierarchy.

10. (C) Nevertheless, most contacts suggest that Dung remains well positioned to remain Prime Minister; indeed, this may have been his goal all along. Though stung by criticism, the Prime Minister has developed an unprecedentedly tight hold over the state bureaucracy. Just as critically, Dung -- a former wartime military medic and police official -- retains strong backing within the Ministries of Public Security and Defense, support that has likely only been reinforced during the most recent crackdown on political dissent (ref E). Perhaps as an effort to showcase this, Dung has over the past months made several well-publicized visits to military commands and has addressed MPS functions. Dung also maintains extremely close contacts with MPS Minister Le Hong Anh, though Anh may not continue in his present position past 2011 (septel).

Regionalism: Why the Conventional Wisdom Might be Wrong

--------------------------------------------- ----------

11. (C) If conventional wisdom prevails, Southerners would for the first time occupy the two most important positions in Vietnam's Party-state structure, and would be in a position to keep their jobs for an additional ten years -- an untenable situation from the standpoint of the CPV's traditional power brokers in the North. Since Party strongman Le Duan's death in 1986, the General Secretary has always come from the North, the Prime Minister from the South; there has been an additional effort, less consistently applied, to have the third position in Vietnam's traditional power troika, State President, come from the Center. XXXXXXXXXXXX argue that regionalism is less and less correlated with ideological differences and of late has

HANOI 00000809 004 OF 004

faded in importance. Additionally, XXXXXXXXXXXX and others maintain, there are important factional divisions among Southerners themselves: Sang, Dung, and State President Triet may all be former HCMC Party Chiefs, but they are not necessarily allies. There is much truth to this; however, our assessment is that having both the PM and President come from the South was an extremely hard pill for many Northerners to swallow in 2006, made palatable only because the top spot was held by a Northerner. Losing the positions of both General Secretary and Prime Minister would be too much for some to contemplate. (Comment: It is also important to keep in mind that factionalism, of which regionalism remains the most potent fault line, increasingly is no longer about ideology -- it is about power, patronage, and wealth. End comment.)

The Dark-Horse Contenders -------------------------

12. (C) Neither Sang nor Dung is likely to step aside without a struggle. If one is forced to sacrifice his ambitions, it is likely to be Sang. If Sang does not become General Secretary, a frequently mentioned alternative could be National Assembly Chair Nguyen Phu Trong, who has ably managed Vietnam's increasingly assertive national legislature and is a known commodity, having also served credibly as Hanoi Party Secretary. XXXXXXXXXXXX confided that Trong is lobbying to have the 67 limit apply not just to the position of General Secretary, but to each of the "four pillars": GS, PM, State Secretary, and NA Chair.

13. (C) A more radical choice could be the newest Politburo member, the hard-line chair of the CPV Ideology and Educational Commission (IEC) To Huy Rua. It would be unusual for a recently appointed Politburo member to ascend to the top of the CPV apparatus so soon; however, Rua has developed a formidable curriculum vitae. Rua has been a member of the Secretariat since 2006, which puts him at the heart of CPV policy making; as the long-serving IEC Chair and as a former head of the Ho Chi Minh Political Academy, he has impeccable ideological credentials; and, perhaps most importantly, as the former Party Chair for Haiphong, Rua has "executive experience" running a major provincial-level city. We have no information to corroborate an assertion by Australian academic Carlye Thayer that Rua is an ally of Sang. Rather, Rua is considered to be a protege of fellow Thanh Hoa stalwart, the hard-line former General Secretary Le Kha Phieu. Whatever the case, Rua's public profile has risen appreciably in the weeks after the most recent Plenum. On August 3, for example, Rua's views on "self-evolution" made the front-page piece in the leading CPV daily, Nhan Dan. On August 30, state media lavished extensive coverage on his visit to HCMC, where he exhorted the country's youth to follow the example of Ho Chi Minh. Rua was also shown chairing regional organizing meetings laying the groundwork for provincial Party Congresses.

14. (C) If Dung, on the other hand, is unable to retain his seat -- and Sang, in turn, ascends to the position of General Secretary -- this would likely produce a reversal of the normal regional balance, with a Northerner becoming Prime Minister. But here the field is, if anything, even narrower. For the past 20 years, Vietnam's Prime Ministers have come from the ranks of serving Deputy Prime Minister: of Vietnam's five current DPMs, only three are on the Politburo, and of them, two are scheduled to retire in 2011, leaving only Standing DPM Nguyen Sing Hung. Hung is a Northerner and an economic technocrat, and has the additional advantage of being one of PM Dung's bitterest rivals, according to several contacts. However, Hung is himself an unpopular figure. When the newly convened National Assembly met in 2007 to formally ratify the Party's selections for PM, DPMs, and government ministers -- normally a perfunctory ritual -- only 58% voted to approve DPM Hung, a shockingly low figure considering that 92% of the NA's deputies are Party members.
******
    US embassy cables: Concerns over Vietnamese crackdown
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 12 January 2011 12.12 GMT

Cable sent: 20/01/2010

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 HANOI 000007
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/MLS, DRL/IRF AND DRL/AWH

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/01/20
TAGS: PHUM, PGOV, KIRF, HURI, PREL, VM

SUBJECT: Vietnam Religious Freedom Update - The Case Against CPC

Re-Designation
REF: A) HANOI 5; HANOI 3; 09 HANOI 1398; 09 HANOI 1202; 09 HANOI 1182 09 HANOI 1084; 09 HANOI 873; 09 HANOI 859; 09 HANOI 839; 09 HANOI 713 09 HANOI 695; 09 HANOI 694

CLASSIFIED BY: Michael Michalak, Ambassador; REASON: 1.4(B), (D)

1. (C) SUMMARY: Vietnam's poor handling of the situations at the Plum Village Community at the Bat Nha Pagoda and the Dong Chiem Catholic parish last week — particularly the excessive use of violence — is troublesome and indicative of a larger GVN crackdown on human rights in the run-up to the January 2011 Party Congress.

However, these situations are primarily "land disputes," do not meet the statutory requirement in the 1998 International Religious Freedom Act, and should not divert our attention from the significant gains in expanding religious freedoms that Vietnam has made since the lifting of CPC designation in November 2006. These gains include increased recognition and registration of scores of new religions, implementation of a new legal framework on religion, and training programs at the local and national level. Catholic and Protestant communities, including those in the North and Northwest Highlands, continue to report improvements, as do members of the Muslim, Baha'i, and Cao Dai faiths throughout Vietnam. The widespread, systematic religious persecution that existed prior to Vietnam's designation in 2004 does not exist anymore. Post therefore recommends that the Department not re designate Vietnam and instead use high-level engagement opportunities to press the GVN to continue to expand religious freedom in Vietnam. END SUMMARY.

Conditions Prior to CPC Designation

-----------------------------------

2. (C) Prior to the designation of Vietnam as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) in 2004, the Vietnamese government's repression of certain religious groups and their followers was systematic and widespread, and official interference with religious activities was the norm. The U.S. Government had a list of 45 individuals imprisoned because of their religious belief — including members of the Buddhist, Catholic, Protestant, Hoa Hao and Cao Dai faiths. Thousands of Central Highland villagers and other ethnic minorities were restricted from practicing their religion and many were forced to renounce their faith. Religious believers were often subjected to harassment and physical abuse. In 2001, the government forced the closure of nearly all unrecognized Protestant congregations and meeting points in the Central Highlands.

3. (C) The Vietnamese government, moreover, limited the intake of new seminarians and the ordination of new priests to numbers well below the necessary "replacement rate" for the Catholic Church. The government also did not support the Church's participation in humanitarian activities such as the fight against HIV/AIDS. Church requests for the creation of new dioceses, the formation of a new seminary and the appointment of new bishops also languished in the absence of formal GVN approval.

Improvements Prior to Lifting of CPC Designation

--------------------------------------------- ---

4. (C) After Vietnam's designation as a CPC in 2004, DRL/IRF and the Embassy created a roadmap to assist Vietnam in lifting the designation. In 2004 and 2005 — just two years' time — the Vietnamese government introduced sweeping changes to its religious freedom policy by implementing a new legal framework on religion that bans forced renunciation, grants citizens the right to freedom

HANOI 00000007 002 OF 004

of belief and religion, as well as the freedom not to follow a religion, and prohibits violations of these freedoms. The government conducted many training programs to assure uniform compliance of the new legal framework at the provincial, district, commune, and village levels. Central government officials began responding to complaints from religious leaders about their treatment at the grassroots level. Protestants across the north also reported improvement in officials' attitudes towards their religions and practice.

5. (C) In the North and Northwest Highlands, Buddhists, Catholics, Protestants, and the government itself reported an increase in religious activity and observance. Nearly 1000 Southern Evangelical Church of Vietnam (SECV) "meeting points" and places of worship affiliated with other religious organizations in the Central Highlands were registered, including in Gia Lai province where registrations effectively legalized operations for 75,000 believers in the province. 76 SECV congregations were recognized in the Central Highlands and were engaged in regular religious activities. 29 Evangelical Church of Vietnam (ECVN) congregations were registered in the North and Northwest Highlands.

6. (C) The new legal framework allowed for the training of hundreds of new Protestant and Catholic clergy members, including 71 SECV pastors in the Central Highlands. 57 Catholic priests were ordained in a mass public ceremony in Hanoi. Other Catholic priests, including nine in the Dak Lak diocese, were ordained throughout the country. A new SECV Christian training center was approved and opened in Ho Chi Minh City and a new seminary was opened by the Catholic Church in 2006.

7. (C) Throughout the country, including the Central and Northwest Highlands, officially-recognized religious organizations reported that they were able to operate openly, and followers of these religions report that they were able to worship without harassment. Other non-recognized religions, such as the Baha'i faith, reported that their followers did not face harassment and that the authorities facilitated the legalization of their activities. Finally, all individuals raised by the United States as prisoners of concern for reasons connected to their faith were released as of September 2006.

Improvements since Lifting CPC Designation (November 2006)

--------------------------------------------- -------------

8. (C) While implementation of the legal framework has been uneven, the pace of progress continues to be swift. Since 2006, the GOV issued national-level recognition or registration to the following churches: Seventh Day Adventists, Grace Baptist Church, Bani Muslim Sect, Vietnam Baptist Convention (Southern Baptist), Baha'i Faith, Vietnam Mennonite Church, Assemblies of God, United World Mission Church, Pure Land Buddhist Home Practice Association, Vietnam Presbyterian Church, Vietnam Christian Fellowship, the Bani Muslim Sect, Threefold Enlightened Truth Path, the Threefold Southern Tradition, Mysterious Fragrance from Precious Mountains, and the Four Gratitudes.

9. (C) Ho Chi Minh City has registered at least 91 Protestant house churches, serving 7,225 parishioners from many different denominations established before and after 1975. These groups include Pentecostals, Jehovah's Witnesses, Baptists, Presbyterians, Methodists, LDS Church, Assemblies of God and the United Gospel Outreach Church. Additionally, all meeting points that had been closed in the Central Highlands have since been reopened, totaling over 1,700 meeting points and 150 registered congregations. The SECV has also opened scores of new churches with the assistance of Central Highlands' authorities in Gia Lai, Dak Lak, and Dak Nong provinces. The SECV has confirmed that training classes for pastors in Dak Lak and Gia Lai are ongoing and that hundreds of new pastors have been ordained and assigned to newly-registered meeting points. The SECV has reported that a previous shortage of pastors

HANOI 00000007 003 OF 004

in the Central Highlands no longer exists.

10. (C) Additional churches were registered in the Northwest Highlands bringing the total ECVN registered congregations in the region to 168. The ECVN was allowed to build its first new church in decades in Lang Son Province in November 2008. The Church houses an ethnic minority Red Dzao congregation, but will also conduct services for a recently established and newly registered ethnic H'mong congregations. During the past few years, members of Mission Vietnam and foreign visitors, both official and religious, have witnessed religious ceremonies involving thousands of Christians, Catholics and Buddhists, as well as Vietnam's indigenous religions, such as the Cao Dai.

11. (C) Ongoing land disputes notwithstanding, the Catholic Church continues to report that its ability to gather and to worship has improved, and restrictions have eased on the assignment of clergy. During the 2007 visit of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, one Catholic priest told Commissioners that in the past, the Church had to wait for explicit approval from the GVN before moving forward with the appointment of clergy. Now, the Church submits names and the GVN has 30 days to voice its disapproval. The priest said the GVN objected in only one instance, and since the objection came after the 30 days had passed, the Church proceeded with their choice without repercussions. In 2008, the GVN approved the establishment of an additional Catholic seminary and the GVN no longer restricts the number of students entering seminary each year. In April 2008, government officials returned the La Vang church and pilgrimage center, the most important Catholic pilgrimage site in the country.

The GVN also has also relaxed its stance against Church efforts to involve itself in the fight against HIV/AIDS and other social work activities, a process we are encouraging. In December 2009, State President Nguyen Minh Triet met with Pope Benedict XVI in Vatican City for a meeting that the Vatican characterized as a "significant event in the progress of bilateral relations with Vietnam." Since 2006, the Vatican and Vietnam have exchanged a number of delegations, including a January 2007 visit by PM Nguyen Tan Dung, and created a Joint Working Group on reestablishing relations that met for the first time in February 2009.

More Needs to be Done

---------------------

12. (C) Vietnam's improving record on religious freedom has been tarred by the recent violence against Catholics in Dong Chiem and the forced eviction of nearly 400 monks and nuns affiliated with Thich Nhat Hanh's Plum Village Order from first the Bat Nha Pagoda and later the Phuoc Hue Pagoda both in Lam Dong Province. These evictions, and the violence associated with them, were preceded by months of intimidation and physical attacks. Vietnam has been slow to acknowledge the damage caused by the Lang Mai/Bat Nha dispute, with the GVN repeating the now standard line that the incidents reflected a convoluted intra- Buddhist disagreement. As religious freedom progresses in Vietnam, religious groups are increasingly demanding more from the government than the right to worship freely -- including the desire to be more involved in charitable activities and seeking resolution to longstanding property disputes. Vietnam's single- Party-dominated state still draws the line at any co-mingling of religion with politics. This explains not only Vietnam's very rough treatment of leading political dissident and BLOC 8406 cofounder Father Nguyen Van Ly, as well as the GVN's approach to the Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam and the so-called "Dega Protestant Church" in the Central Highlands. Additional areas that need improvement include the slow pace of registrations of Protestant congregations in the Northwest Highlands and the lack of approval of a H'mong translation of the Bible. Isolated incidents of harassment of Christians; and while illegal, the occasional forced renunciation of faith, also continue in far-flung areas.

Comment HANOI 00000007 004 OF 004

-------

13. (C) The GVN is coming under pressure, justifiably, for its ham-fisted, at times brutish, handling of the situations in Bat Nha and Dong Chiem. As we saw with the large-scale Catholic protests a year ago in Hanoi and July 2009 in Quang Binh province (reftels), there are complicated historical and land use issues at play. Until the government develops a transparent, fair process for adjudicating land claims, disputes between the government and religious organizations will continue to fester and occasionally flair up. However, such incidents are largely land issues, not religious persecution. Furthermore, they do not approach the threshold established by the 1998 International Religious Freedom Act. Moreover, despite the continuing problems mentioned above, there are no indications that the GVN is backsliding on its commitment to register and recognize religious groups, a principle condition for the lifting of CPC in 2006. The GVN appears to be implementing its legal framework on religion that it codified in March 2005. END COMMENT.

Friday, February 11, 2011

Tổng thống Ai Cập Hosni Mubarak từ chức


Việt Nam hãy học bài học Tunisia, Egypt
Free the people, Free yourself

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible,
make violence inevitable." - John F. Kennedy


Peaceful Revolution Hopeless
Nonviolence Hopeless With Vietnam Communists
teolangthang

Power Of People



US President Barack Obama said Friday the people of Egypt had spoken after history moved at a "blinding pace," and called on the now-ruling military to ensure a transition towards "genuine democracy".

Obama gave a statement soon after it emerged from a euphoric Cairo that President Hosni Mubarak, a 30-year US ally who America subtly helped push towards the exit, had resigned after days of raging street protests.

"The people of Egypt have spoken - their voices have been heard and Egypt will never be the same," Obama said.

"Egyptians have made it clear that nothing less than genuine democracy will carry the day," Obama said, praising the military for safeguarding the state, but also calling on them to secure a credible political transition.

The US administration had struggled for days to find ways of impacting the 18-day crisis, as Mubarak had defied pressure to end his long authoritarian rule.

Obama had ratcheted up calls for a peaceful, swift transition to democracy, and on Friday he pledged that the United States would stand with the people of Egypt - one of America's staunchest allies and a recipient of some two billion dollars in annual aid.

"By stepping down, President Mubarak responded to the Egyptian peoples' hunger for change," Obama said in his brief statement.

On taking power Friday, the military moved quickly to reassure the citizens whose street revolt toppled Mubarak that it would respect the popular will.

And the White House called on the new authorities in Egypt to honour existing peace agreements with Israel.

"It is important the next government of Egypt recognise the accords that have been signed with the government of Israel," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said.

Mubarak's hurried departure Friday - after saying late Thursday he would stay until September's elections - will have brought relief in Washington, facing a dearth of options to force an end to the crisis.

But Mubarak's exit also posed searching questions about future US Middle East policy, with a possible power vacuum in Egypt.

Still, Obama hailed the toppling of the Arab strongman, brought down by two-weeks of mass protests in Cairo's Tahrir Square, as a defining moment in world history.

"The word Tahrir means liberation. It's a word that speaks to that something in our souls that cries out for freedom," Obama said.

"Forever more it will remind us of the Egyptian people, of what they did, of the things that they stood for, and how they changed their country and in doing so changed the world."

The president also drew parallels to other tumultuous world events, highlighting the end of the Berlin Wall, Indonesians rising up against president Suharto, and Indian independence icon Mahatma Gandhi.

"We can't help, but hear the echoes of history, echoes from Germans tearing down a wall, Indonesian students taking to the streets, Gandhi leading his people down a path of justice," Obama said.

He called on the armed forces to now ensure a political transition that is "credible in the eyes of the Egyptian people," Obama said, warning that there could be "difficult days ahead."

"Over the last few weeks, the wheel of history turned at a blinding pace, as the Egyptian people demanded their universal rights," he said.

Besides praising Egyptians, Obama also sought to make a wider point, apparently seeking to connect with Muslims elsewhere who felt marginalised and may be easy prey for extremists.

"Egyptians have inspired us and they've done so by putting the lie to the idea that justice is best gained through violence," Obama said.

"For Egypt, it was the moral force of non-violence, not terrorism, not mindless killing, but non-violence, moral force, that bent the arc of history towards justice one more."

US lawmakers on Friday were also weighing tighter controls on exports that can help repressive regimes cling to power.

The US Congress, which cheered anti-government protests in Iran last year, also applauded the turmoil that toppled Mubarak, amid worries that US aid and know-how hurt both movements.

"We continue to watch and have concerns about the misuse of any equipment that the United States provides or sells to another nation," said a spokesman for the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee, Josh Holly.

---
    Egypt free as embattled President Honsi Mubarak steps down
By staff writers
February 12, 2011

EGYPT'S Hosni Mubarak resigned as president this morning and handed control to the military, bowing out after an historic 18-day wave of pro-democracy demonstrations by hundreds of thousands.

"God is great!" and "Egypt is free!" shouted the tens of thousands of flag-waving, cheering protesters amassed in the streets of Cairo.

Mr Mubarak himself was believed to be in the Red Sea resort of Sharm el Sheikh, where he has a residence, after delivering a confusing speech yesterday in which he said he was handing over some unspecified powers to Omar Suleiman, his vice president.

But today, it was Mr Suleiman who delivered the brief announcement, shortly after 6pm local time (3am AEST), that Mr Mubarak had resigned and the Higher Council of the Armed Forces would run the affairs of the country.

The group is comprised of the minister of defence, Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi - who stands atop the military hierarchy - along with the military's chief of staff, the chief of operations, and commanders of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Air Defences.

Reuters, citing Al Arabiya television, reported the military council would sack the cabinet, suspend both houses of parliament and rule with the head of the supreme constitutional court.

An army statement was expected later this morning.

Tantawi - a top figure in Egypt's new military regime - drove past Mr Mubarak's former palace and saluted cheering crowds.

In Switzerland, there were reports the country had frozen assets possibly belonging to Mr Mubarak, although there was no indication how much money was involved.

Mr Suleiman's two-sentence announcement of Mubarak's resignation came, coincidentally, on the 32nd anniversary of the Islamic revolution that toppled the US-backed shah.

Still to be resolved were what kind of power will emerge in next September's scheduled presidential election and what Mr Mubarak's decision would mean for the US and Israel - as well as the future of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Historic victory - world leaders

World leaders have hailed the toppling of Mr Mubarak as an historic victory for people power

US President Barack Obama said on Friday the people of Egypt have spoken after history moved at a "blinding pace'', and called on the now-ruling military to ensure a transition towards "genuine democracy''.

"The people of Egypt have spoken - their voices have been heard and Egypt will never be the same,'' Mr Obama said in his first public response to the earlier resignation of Mr Mubarak after days of raging protests.

"By stepping down, President Mubarak responded to the Egyptian peoples' hunger for change,'' Mr Obama said, in his only reference to a deposed Arab strongman who had been a staunch US ally for three decades.

"Egyptians have made it clear that nothing less than genuine democracy will carry the day,'' Obama said, praising the military for serving responsibly to preserve the state.

The armed forces would now have to ensure a political transition that was "credible in the eyes of the Egyptian people'', Mr Obama said, warning there could be "difficult days ahead''.

"Over the last few weeks, the wheel of history turned at a blinding pace, as the Egyptian people demanded their universal rights,'' he said.

As well as praising Egyptians, Mr Obama also sought to make a wider point, apparently seeking to connect with Muslims elsewhere who felt marginalised and may be easy prey for extremists.

"Egyptians have inspired us and they've done so by putting the lie to the idea that justice is best gained through violence,'' Mr Obama said.

"For Egypt, it was the moral force of non-violence, not terrorism, not mindless killing, but non-violence, moral force, that bent the arc of history towards justice once more.''

The president also drew parallels to the "echoes of history'', mentioning Germans tearing down the Berlin Wall, Indonesians revolting against former president Suharto, and Indian independence icon Mahatma Gandhi.

-----
    Mubarak's departure 'victory for people'

By staff writers

WORLD leaders have hailed the toppling of Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak as an historic victory for people power, paving the way for democracy, amid scenes of jubilation.

As Mr Mubarak's three-decade-long rule ended on Friday, a day after he enraged protesters by refusing to stand down, messages of congratulations to the Egyptian people have flooded in.

US President Barack Obama said on Friday the people of Egypt have spoken after history moved at a "blinding pace'', and called on the now-ruling military to ensure a transition towards "genuine democracy''.

"The people of Egypt have spoken - their voices have been heard and Egypt will never be the same,'' Mr Obama said in his first public response to the earlier resignation of Mr Mubarak after days of raging protests.

"By stepping down, President Mubarak responded to the Egyptian peoples' hunger for change,'' Mr Obama said, in his only reference to a deposed Arab strongman who had been a staunch US ally for three decades.

"Egyptians have made it clear that nothing less than genuine democracy will carry the day,'' Obama said, praising the military for serving responsibly to preserve the state.

The armed forces would now have to ensure a political transition that was "credible in the eyes of the Egyptian people'', Mr Obama said, warning there could be "difficult days ahead''.

"Over the last few weeks, the wheel of history turned at a blinding pace, as the Egyptian people demanded their universal rights,'' he said.

As well as praising Egyptians, Mr Obama also sought to make a wider point, apparently seeking to connect with Muslims elsewhere who felt marginalised and may be easy prey for extremists.

"Egyptians have inspired us and they've done so by putting the lie to the idea that justice is best gained through violence,'' Mr Obama said.

"For Egypt, it was the moral force of non-violence, not terrorism, not mindless killing, but non-violence, moral force, that bent the arc of history towards justice once more.''

The president also drew parallels to the "echoes of history'', mentioning Germans tearing down the Berlin Wall, Indonesians revolting against former president Suharto, and Indian independence icon Mahatma Gandhi.

---
    Tổng thống Ai Cập Hosni Mubarak từ chức
Nguyễn Khanh, biên tập viên RFA
2011-02-11


Hàng triệu người dân Ai Cập vẫn đứng chật mọi ngã đường ở thủ đô Cairo và những thành phố lớn, hô to những khẩu hiệu mang nội dung chào mừng một quốc gia vừa hồi sinh sau 30 năm bị cai trị bởi chế độ độc tài Hosni Mubarak.

Hình ảnh phổ biến trên các đài truyền hình quốc tế cho thấy dân chúng Ai Cập hân hoan đón chào ngày hội mới của quốc gia, đánh dấu sự thành công của một cuộc cách mạng huy hoàng sau gần 3 tuần lễ đấu tranh không ngừng nghỉ. Rất nhiều người đã gục đầu khóc vì sung sướng và vì hãnh diện đã góp phần cho cuộc cách mạng mới thành công.


Trong một thông báo đọc trên truyền hình hôm 11-2-2011,
Phó tổng thống Ai Cập Omar Suleiman tuyên bố Tổng thống Hosni Mubarak đã từ chức

Trên trang mạng xã hội, khôi nguyên Nobel Hòa Bình và cũng là lãnh tụ đối lập hàng đầu Mohamed ElBaradei viết rằng Ai Cập đã thật sự tự do và mọi người đều hãnh diện về quốc gia của họ.

Trước đó khi trả lời phiỏng vấn của đài truyền hình Al-Jazeera, ông ElBaradei nói rằng người dân Ai Cập đã được giải phóng, và kêu gọi mọi người tận dụng điều quý báu này để cùng xây dựng đất nước tự do, dân chủ, theo đúng với nguyện vọng đã nuôi từ bao nhiêu năm qua.

Tình hình của Ai Cập thay đổi trong không đầy 24 tiếng đồng hồ, kể từ khi Tổng Thống Hosni Mubarak đọc bài diễn văn hồi khuya hôm qua, nói rằng sẽ không từ chức nhưng trao quyền lãnh đạo cho phó Tổng Thống Omar Suleiman.

Ngay sau đó một làn sóng người đã đua nhau tràn ra đường, tiến về Dinh Tổng Thống và đóng chốt trước trụ sở Đài Truyền Hình Quốc Gia, tiếp tục làm áp lực buộc ông Mubarak phải từ chức. Cuối cùng, nhà lãnh đạo 82 tuổi này đã cùng với gia đình lên máy bay rời Cairo. Tin tức nói là cựu tổng thống Ai Cập hiện đang có mặt ở khu nghỉ mát Sharm el-Sheikh thuộc Hồng Hải.

Khi thông báo tin Tổng Thống Hosni Mubarak từ chức, Phó Tổng Thống Omar Suleiman cũng cho biết một hội đồng quân nhân sẽ được thành lập để điều hành guồng máy lãnh đạo quốc gia, và một cuộc bầu cử tự do, dân chủ, công bằng sẽ được tổ chức vào tháng Chín tới đây. Tuy nhiên cũng có dư luận nói rằng có thể cuộc bầu cử sẽ diễn ra sớm hơn.

Một số nhà quan sát đã lên tiếng bày tỏ sự lo ngại vì không rõ quân đội của Ai Cập sẽ thực hiện bước tiến dân chủ như thế nào. Hiện giờ quân đội đang nằm dưới quyền điều khiển của Thống Chế Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, vị Bộ Trưởng Quốc Phòng thân tín của ông Mubarak.

Ngay chính các viên chức Mỹ hiểu rõ tình hình chính trường Ai Cập cũng nói là Thống Chế Tantawi, 72 tuổi, là người không ủng hộ đổi mới và chủ trương phải có biện pháp mạnh với tổ chức Huynh Đệ Hồi Giáo. Tổ chức này là một trong những tổ chức đối lập bị cấm hoạt động dưới thời Mubarak, nhưng được dự đoán sẽ giữ một vai trò quan trọng trong chính trường tương lai.

Ông Essam el-Erian, phát ngôn viên của tổ chức này nói với hãng thông tấn AFP rằng thành công là thành công của mọi người Ai Cập, đồng thời ngợi khen quân đội đã giữ đúng lời hứa đứng về phía nhân dân.

Tại Washington, Tổng Thống Barack Obama nói rằng dân chúng Ai Cập đã cất tiếng nói bày tỏ quyết định của họ, và việc làm này đã tạo khí thế cho người dân toàn cầu. Nhiều vị dân cử Mỹ cũng đã lên tiếng cho rằng quyết định từ chức của ông Mubarak là quyết định sáng suốt.

Các quan chức Nhà Trắng nói rằng chính phủ Hoa Kỳ sẽ làm tất cả những gì có thể làm để duy trì mối quan hệ đang có với quân đội Ai Cập, là lực lượng lãnh trách nhiệm duy trì an ninh và ổn định cho quốc gia đến khi một chính phủ dân cử thành hình. Dưới thời ông Mubarak, số tiền Hoa Kỳ viện trợ quân sự cho Ai Cập lên đến 1.3 tỷ dollars.

Tổng thư ký NATO là ông Anders Fogh Rasmussen cũng đưa ra phát biểu mang nội dung tin tưởng Ai Cập sẽ ổn định và cuộc chuyển quyền sẽ diễn ra êm thắm.

Thủ Tướng Đức là bà Angela Merkel thì nhắc nhở những nhà lãnh đạo tương lai của Ai Cập đừng quên xây dựng hòa bình cho vùng Trung Đông, và tiếp tục tuân thủ bản hiệp ước hòa bình mà Ai Cập đã ký kết với Israel trước đây.

-----
    "Triều đại" Mubarak đã kết thúc
Nguyễn Khanh, biên tập viên RFA
2011-02-11

Hàng triệu người dân Ai Cập vẫn đứng chật mọi ngã đường ở thủ đô Cairo và những thành phố lớn, hô to những khẩu hiệu mang nội dung chào mừng một quốc gia vừa hồi sinh sau 30 năm bị cai trị bởi chế độ độc tài Hosni Mubarak.

Hình ảnh phổ biến trên các đài truyền hình quốc tế cho thấy dân chúng Ai Cập hân hoan đón chào ngày hội mới của quốc gia, đánh dấu sự thành công của một cuộc cách mạng huy hoàng sau gần 3 tuần lễ đấu tranh không ngừng nghỉ. Rất nhiều người đã gục đầu khóc vì sung sướng và vì hãnh diện đã góp phần cho cuộc cách mạng mới thành công.

Trên trang mạng xã hội, khôi nguyên Nobel Hòa Bình và cũng là lãnh tụ đối lập hàng đầu Mohamed ElBaradei viết rằng Ai Cập đã thật sự tự do và mọi người đều hãnh diện về quốc gia của họ.

Trước đó khi trả lời phiỏng vấn của đài truyền hình Al-Jazeera, ông ElBaradei nói rằng người dân Ai Cập đã được giải phóng, và kêu gọi mọi người tận dụng điều quý báu này để cùng xây dựng đất nước tự do, dân chủ, theo đúng với nguyện vọng đã nuôi từ bao nhiêu năm qua.

Tình hình của Ai Cập thay đổi trong không đầy 24 tiếng đồng hồ, kể từ khi Tổng Thống Hosni Mubarak đọc bài diễn văn hồi khuya hôm qua, nói rằng sẽ không từ chức nhưng trao quyền lãnh đạo cho phó Tổng Thống Omar Suleiman.

Ngay sau đó một làn sóng người đã đua nhau tràn ra đường, tiến về Dinh Tổng Thống và đóng chốt trước trụ sở Đài Truyền Hình Quốc Gia, tiếp tục làm áp lực buộc ông Mubarak phải từ chức. Cuối cùng, nhà lãnh đạo 82 tuổi này đã cùng với gia đình lên máy bay rời Cairo. Tin tức nói là cựu tổng thống Ai Cập hiện đang có mặt ở khu nghỉ mát Sharm el-Sheikh thuộc Hồng Hải.

Khi thông báo tin Tổng Thống Hosni Mubarak từ chức, Phó Tổng Thống Omar Suleiman cũng cho biết một hội đồng quân nhân sẽ được thành lập để điều hành guồng máy lãnh đạo quốc gia, và một cuộc bầu cử tự do, dân chủ, công bằng sẽ được tổ chức vào tháng Chín tới đây. Tuy nhiên cũng có dư luận nói rằng có thể cuộc bầu cử sẽ diễn ra sớm hơn.

Một số nhà quan sát đã lên tiếng bày tỏ sự lo ngại vì không rõ quân đội của Ai Cập sẽ thực hiện bước tiến dân chủ như thế nào. Hiện giờ quân đội đang nằm dưới quyền điều khiển của Thống Chế Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, vị Bộ Trưởng Quốc Phòng thân tín của ông Mubarak.

Ngay chính các viên chức Mỹ hiểu rõ tình hình chính trường Ai Cập cũng nói là Thống Chế Tantawi, 72 tuổi, là người không ủng hộ đổi mới và chủ trương phải có biện pháp mạnh với tổ chức Huynh Đệ Hồi Giáo. Tổ chức này là một trong những tổ chức đối lập bị cấm hoạt động dưới thời Mubarak, nhưng được dự đoán sẽ giữ một vai trò quan trọng trong chính trường tương lai.

Ông Essam el-Erian, phát ngôn viên của tổ chức này nói với hãng thông tấn AFP rằng thành công là thành công của mọi người Ai Cập, đồng thời ngợi khen quân đội đã giữ đúng lời hứa đứng về phía nhân dân.

Tại Washington, Tổng Thống Barack Obama nói rằng dân chúng Ai Cập đã cất tiếng nói bày tỏ quyết định của họ, và việc làm này đã tạo khí thế cho người dân toàn cầu. Nhiều vị dân cử Mỹ cũng đã lên tiếng cho rằng quyết định từ chức của ông Mubarak là quyết định sáng suốt.

Các quan chức Nhà Trắng nói rằng chính phủ Hoa Kỳ sẽ làm tất cả những gì có thể làm để duy trì mối quan hệ đang có với quân đội Ai Cập, là lực lượng lãnh trách nhiệm duy trì an ninh và ổn định cho quốc gia đến khi một chính phủ dân cử thành hình. Dưới thời ông Mubarak, số tiền Hoa Kỳ viện trợ quân sự cho Ai Cập lên đến 1.3 tỷ dollars.

Tổng thư ký NATO là ông Anders Fogh Rasmussen cũng đưa ra phát biểu mang nội dung tin tưởng Ai Cập sẽ ổn định và cuộc chuyển quyền sẽ diễn ra êm thắm.

Thủ Tướng Đức là bà Angela Merkel thì nhắc nhở những nhà lãnh đạo tương lai của Ai Cập đừng quên xây dựng hòa bình cho vùng Trung Đông, và tiếp tục tuân thủ bản hiệp ước hòa bình mà Ai Cập đã ký kết với Israel trước đây.


Thursday, February 10, 2011

ÐỒNG TIỀN ÐI TRƯỚC - Lê Văn Ấn

Lê Văn Ấn

Dân chúng Hà Nội cho rằng “Nghe Trung Cộng đau bụng ở Bắc Kinh, Việt Cộng đã vội vã chuẩn bị cái bô tại Hà Nội”. Nay thì cả Trung Cộng lẫn Việt Cộng không những “đau bụng” mà phát sốt khi nghe thấy những cuộc biểu tình lật đổ không chỉ tại Tunisia và Ai Cập mà còn lan rộng ra các nước Jordan, Ma rốc v.v… Việt Cộng đã cho mấy sư đoàn về ven đô Saigon chứng tỏ chúng đề phòng dân chúng Việt Nam nổi lên làm cách mạng. Quan thầy của Việt Cộng là Trung Cộng cũng lo sốt vó và chúng đã nghiêm cấm các cơ quan truyền thông áp dụng triệt để “3 không: không nghe, không thấy, và không biết” những gì xảy ra ở Ai Cập và Tunisia.

Hai nước Cộng Sản độc tài, độc đảng hà hiếp bóc lột dân chúng mấy chục năm trời nay, người dân chịu đựng những khổ cực, nhục nhã gấp mấy lần các nước “đang làm cách mạng”. Nếu Cộng Sản không đàn áp dân chúng, không bóc lột, tham nhũng, độc tài thì tại sao phải đề phòng “cách mạng”? Những nguồn tin từ trong nước cho biết hiện nay ở Việt Nam đâu đâu cũng bàn tán đến vấn đề Tunisia và Ai Cập. Nói cách khác là người dân cũng đã muốn làm một cái gì cho dân tộc. Nhưng lâu nay, vì những thủ đoạn tuyên truyền của Việt Cộng mà dân chúng còn do dự.

Luận điệu tuyên truyền độc ác nhất là: Mỹ không bật đèn xanh. Nói cách khác là Mỹ ủng hộ Việt Cộng, Mỹ rất cần Việt Cộng để chống Trung Cộng. Những cái loa tuyên truyền của VC tại hải ngoại nói chung và tại Hoa Kỳ nói riêng hết lời ca ngợi “tình hữu nghị VC và Mỹ” hay “Phải chống Cộng theo kiểu Mỹ”. Nhưng qua những tin tức công khai, người ta được biết và chính giới lãnh đạo Hoa Kỳ kể cả Tổng Thống Obama cũng nhìn nhận Tổng Thống Hosni Mubarak là “đồng minh thân cận” của Hoa Kỳ. Thế mà chỉ mấy ngày sau khi dân Ai Cập biểu tình, Tổng Thống Obama đã đề cập đến sự “chuyển quyền trong trật tự”, sự “phải tôn trọng dân ý” v.v… Ai cũng cho rằng Hoa Kỳ đã trở mặt với đồng minh. Ðây là một cái tát vào mặt Việt Cộng và tay sai của chúng ở hải ngoại. Hoa Kỳ chỉ biết Hoa Kỳ mà thôi! Hoa Kỳ thấy ai thắng thế là ủng hộ. Tóm lại, qua thái độ mấy ngày gần đây của Hoa Kỳ đối với Tổng Thống Hosni Mubarak trong cuộc cách mạng của Ai Cập, luận điệu: Mỹ ủng hộ Việt Cộng thì người dân không thể nào lật đổ Việt Cộng là một khẳng định hoàn toàn sai. Vấn đề này cũng khiến cho Việt Cộng như chết đuối vớ phải bèo mà tưởng là cọc! Nhưng, nếu Việt Cộng chú ý một chút, chúng sẽ thấy Hoa Kỳ bao nhiêu lần đề cao vấn đề nhân quyền mà tại sao khi vào việc lại không nghe, không thấy và không biết Việt Cộng vi phạm nhân quyền? Vì quyền lợi của Mỹ. Nghĩ rằng đã có Hoa Kỳ chống lưng thì không ai lật đổ chế độ Cộng Sản là lạc hậu.

Tuy nhiên cũng có người cho rằng cuộc cách mạng lật đổ Nga Sô và Ðông Âu đã do Hoa Kỳ nhúng tay gần như trực tiếp, thì cuộc cách mạng Hoa Lài tại Tunisia và Ai Cập làm sao tránh khỏi bàn tay lông lá của Mỹ, làm sao CIA không biết? Tại sao họ là đồng minh của Mubarak lại không thông báo, không giúp Mubarak “trước khi trời mưa”? Hay là cuộc cách mạng này cũng do Hoa Kỳ dàn dựng? Nhiều người nghi ngờ điều này vì họ căn cứ vào câu trả lời của bà Stephanie O’Sullivan thuộc Ủy Ban Tình Báo Quốc Gia với Quốc Hội Hoa Kỳ, đại ý “Chúng tôi có trình Tổng Thống về vụ này nhưng không biết nó xuất phát từ đâu và do đâu”. Một câu trả lời huề vốn. Tại sao phải trả lời như vậy? Chính câu trả lời này khiến người ta nghi ngờ có bàn tay của Hoa Kỳ nhúng vào vụ này. Nhưng nhiều khi nói như vậy mà không phải vậy. Hoa Kỳ luôn sẵn sàng để kiếm một “chính quyền “Sơ Cua”, sẵn sàng thay thế chính phủ đương quyền để đáp ứng kịp thời khi có những biến động bất ngờ, trừ phi sau đó là chính Hoa Kỳ “cầm quyền” như ở Việt Nam sau khi lật đổ Tổng Thống Ngô Ðình Diệm. Nói cách khác là Hoa Kỳ chỉ phò thịnh và sẵn sàng đổi ngựa. Thái độ các tướng lãnh Ai Cập, sự dùng dằng khi thì yêu cầu Mubarak rời khỏi chức vụ càng sớm càng tốt, khi thì ủng hộ một sự chuyển quyền trong trật tự, v.v… chứng tỏ Hoa Kỳ chỉ ủng hộ quyền lợi của Hoa Kỳ. Có trách là trách Mubarak “no bụng chứ không no miệng” hoặc “con mắt lớn hơn bao tử” tham quyền cố vị, cố ăn cho đến lúc nổ bụng, không nghĩ đến thế hệ mai sau, tương lai của tổ quốc mà ngày nay phải thiệt thân. “Sống chết với bạn” không có trong từ điển của Hoa Kỳ. Việt Cộng nên nhớ điều đó.

Cuộc cách mạng xanh, lật đổ một loạt mấy nước Cộng Sản, nhất là đầu nậu Liên Sô đã mang lại thắng lợi cho Hoa Kỳ là chấm dứt chiến tranh lạnh trong sự thắng thế của Hoa Kỳ. Năm xưa, khi còn chiến tranh lạnh, Hoa Kỳ đã “bơm” Trung Cộng lên để đối đầu với Liên Sô, tiếc rằng Hoa Kỳ không dự trù một kế hoạch dẹp Trung Cộng sau khi Liên Sô sụp đổ để ngày nay càng ngày càng thấy hiểm họa Trung Cộng, cũng như trong Ðệ Nhị Thế Chiến, Ðồng Minh đã để Phát xít Ðức đánh Nga Sô tơi bời hoa lá mới nhảy vào vòng chiến, nhưng lại ngờ nghệch đề cao Nga Sô, cho Nga Sô đồng bàn tại hội nghị Yalta thành ra đại họa.

Cuộc Cách Mạng Hoa Lài mang lại lợi ích gì cho Hoa Kỳ?

Hoa Kỳ rất hoan nghênh các cuộc cách mạng cho nhân quyền, công lý và dân chủ? Dân chúng Hoa Kỳ rất yêu chuộng tự do dân chủ và nhân quyền, chính phủ Hoa Kỳ giúp đỡ dân chúng nổi dậy đòi quyền sống, đòi tự do dân chủ là điều hợp lý. Nhưng có người cho rằng tự do dân chủ và nhân quyền rất nhiều lần ĐÃ chỉ là cái cớ, cái bình phong để Hoa Kỳ tham dự vào nội bộ các nước, vì vậy mới có biệt danh “sen đầm quốc tế”. Tuy nhiên, nếu ngày mai ngày kia, Trung Cộng bị một cuộc cách mạng Hoa Lài; Hoa Kỳ có thái độ nào? Nếu Việt Cộng bị dân chúng nổi lên lật đổ thì Hoa Kỳ có lợi hay hại? Hỏi tức là trả lời. Hoa Kỳ chỉ chú ý đến một điều, một điều kiện: bất bạo động. Các cuộc cách mạng trong thế kỷ trước và đầu thế kỷ này hoàn toàn bất bạo động.

ÐIỂM VÀ DIỆN

Nói đến bất bạo động thì phải nói đến bạo lực. Có nhiều người, nhất là tay sai Việt Cộng đã đưa ra những cái “sợ” rất quan trọng, đó là sợ một khi Việt Cộng bị dân chúng nổi lên lật đổ thì chúng sẽ kêu cứu Trung Cộng, Trung Cộng sẽ đưa quân sang đàn áp và chiếm đóng luôn Việt Nam? Chắc chắn Việt Cộng không làm điều đó được. “Chờ mạ thì má đã sưng” Việt Cộng sẽ bị tiêu diệt trước khi Trung Cộng cho quân qua. Mà lý do gì Trung Cộng có quyền đưa quân qua? Tổng Thống Obama trong mấy ngày qua đã chẳng nói đi, nói lại phải tôn trọng người dân, không dùng bạo lực và hoan nghênh quân đội Ai Cập đã không đàn áp người dân hay sao? Ðó là quân đội Ai Cập chứ không phải quân đội ngoại nhập! Chưa kể người dân Trung Cộng lâu nay không phải hoàn toàn ngoan ngoãn phục vụ đảng Cộng Sản. Người dân Trung Cộng không phải đồng lòng thắt lưng buộc bụng để Ðảng và Nhà Nước lên cung trăng, có máy bay tàng hình, có hỏa tiễn bắn tới Hoa Kỳ. Trái lại, khắp nơi ở Hoa Lục đều có những cuộc nổi dậy, có những cuộc chống đối, 100 triệu tín đồ Pháp Luân Công, dân tộc Tân Cương, Tây Tạng, Mông Cổ … họ để cho Trung Cộng đè đầu cỡi cổ hoài sao? Họ không bằng dân trí của Tunisia, Ai Cập, Ma rốc, Jordan v.v… hay sao? Nhất là họ không bằng người Việt Nam hay sao? Nếu Hoa Kỳ đã nhóm lên đốm lửa nay trở thành ngọn lửa cách mạng cho Tunisia và Ai Cập cùng các nước lân cận thì đó chỉ là “Diện”, còn Trung Cộng mới là “Ðiểm”, Việt Cộng bị lật đổ cũng chỉ là đốm lửa – sparkle – nói theo Lê Nin. Ðốm lửa này sẽ tạt qua Hoa Lục và cháy lên ngọn lửa cách mạng. Nếu không phải Hoa Kỳ đã tạo nên đốm lửa tại Tunisia và Ai Cập thì dân Trung Hoa và Việt Nam lại càng “phấn khởi” mà noi theo ngọn lửa đó. Người dân Trung Cộng bấy lâu rất căm tức vì Ðảng và Nhà Nước bóp hầu nặn họng họ để cho Hoa Kỳ vay tiền, để lên cung trăng v.v…

Các nước xung quanh Ai Cập đang “chữa cháy” bằng cách đi trước một bước, nới rộng các quyền tự do dân chủ cho người dân. “Ðồng tiền đi trước là đồng tiền khôn. Ðồng tiền đi sau là đồng tiền dại”, Trung Cộng và Việt Cộng tự hào là “đỉnh cao trí tuệ” của loài người chắc chắn đã nhìn thấy điều đó, chỉ ngại một điều là chúng bắt chước Mubarak, no bụng chứ không no miệng, cứ ăn mãi cho đến khi nổ bụng.

Cách Mạng Việt Nam bắt đầu tại đâu?

Bà Stephanie O’Sullivan không biết cách mạng Ai Cập từ đâu ra chứ ở Việt Nam thì rất dễ biết, Việt Cộng đã đề phòng dân chúng Saigon trước tiên, do đó, chúng đã đưa quân đội đến thị oai, dù chúng biết quân đội như dao 2 lưỡi, có thể trở súng lại bắn vào chúng thay vì bắn đồng bào. Hoặc là trong hàng tướng lãnh đã có một số bị Hoa Kỳ mua chuộc chỉ chờ có dịp là “bung”. Ngoài Saigon ra, Việt Cộng rất sợ “Quê Hương của Bác”, nơi đó nói thẳng ra là Nghệ Tĩnh Bình và Giáo Phận Vinh của Công Giáo. Việt Cộng đã thử sức họ trong vụ Tam Tòa, đã có nửa triệu người được điều động trong một thời gian ngắn. Ðức Cha Nguyễn Thái Hợp trấn nhậm ở giáo phận này có lẽ cũng là cái “may” cho Việt Cộng. Bằng chứng là có lời đồn “ngài xin gì Việt Cộng cũng cho”, nhưng mới cho bằng miệng, kể cả vụ Cồn Dầu! Bánh vẽ làm sao gạt được người thật, thưa Ðức Cha?

Ngoài Nghệ Tĩnh Bình trong đó có giáo phận Vinh ra, đồng bào Hà Nội cộng với giáo dân Tổng Giáo Phận Hà Nội cũng là một “lò lửa” đang cháy âm ỉ. Người dân Hà Nội dù sao cũng là dân thủ đô, dân Thăng Long đã chứng kiến biết bao nhiêu cảnh “bưng bô Trung Cộng của Việt Cộng” tự ái dân tộc đã nung nấu tâm can họ. mà lẽ ra họ đã nhập cuộc cuộc “cách mạng cầu nguyện” của Ðức Tổng Giám Mục Ngô Quang Kiệt, nếu không bị Vatican bóp chết trong trứng nước, nhưng nhân sự còn đó, linh hồn của cuộc cách mạng cầu nguyện đang ở Châu Sơn. Sự kiện Vatican “chấp thuận cho Ðức Tổng Giám Mục Ngô Quang Kiệt nghỉ hưu” và đưa Ðức Phổng Nguyễn Văn Nhơn ra thay thế, thế mà hay. Việt Cộng không thể chống lại “linh hồn”, linh hồn không chức vụ thì không trách nhiệm, nhưng linh hồn làm cho thể xác sống và hoạt động. Mấy trăm ngàn giáo dân Hà Nội trong đó có Thái Hà của các cha Dòng Chúa Cứu Thế, cộng với người dân các tôn giáo khác là một lực lượng đáng kể so với dân chúng Ai Cập.

BIẾT CHĂN CÓ RẬN

Lâu nay, người ta cứ mỉa mai những cán bộ chóp bu của Việt Cộng khi về nghỉ hưu rồi mới phê bình, phê chén Ðảng và Nhà Nước, khiến bình luận gia Lê Minh Khôi cho rằng Những “Lão Thành Cách Mạng” hay “Thủ phạm của mọi tội ác”. Nói cách khác là họ biết việc họ làm là phản dân hại nước, điển hình là ông Hoàng Minh Chính, khi ban biên tập tuần báo Tiếng Dân hỏi ông ta nghĩ thế nào về vụ Hồ Chí Minh sai Phạm Văn Ðồng dâng biển cho Trung Cộng, ông nói ngay: “Hồ Chí Minh có tội phản quốc! Nhưng vì lúc đó tôi là đảng viên Cộng Sản không nói được” . Tuy nhiên, những sự phê bình vào giờ thứ 25 đó cũng cho chúng ta một hy vọng: tất cả những cán bộ Việt Cộng đều biết và hiểu rất rõ ràng rằng Cộng Sản là kẻ phản quốc số một, Cộng Sản phục vụ Trung Cộng, Cộng Sản độc tài, phản dân chủ v.v… nhưng vì quyền lợi nên những tên đương quyền phải ngậm miệng nuốt đô la. Nếu một khi dân chúng nổi lên chắc chắn họ không dại mà chống đối. Nếu khôn ra một chút, chắc chắn những tên Cộng Sản đương quyền phải hiểu rằng đừng để nước đến trôn mới nhảy. Trên thực tế Cộng Sản đã vứt chủ nghĩa Mác Lê vào sọt rác từ lâu, bây giờ, hãy lục lại túi khôn của tổ tiên mà áp dụng trong giai đoạn cấp bách này, túi khôn đó là “Ðồng Tiền Ði Trước là đồng tiền khôn”.

Lê Văn Ấn


Saturday, February 5, 2011

Egypt Revolution


Việt Nam hãy học bài học Tunisia, Egypt
Free the people, Free yourself

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible,
make violence inevitable." - John F. Kennedy


Peaceful Revolution Hopeless
Nonviolence Hopeless With Vietnam Communists
teolangthang

Ngọn đuốc Tunisia








Power of People













THE FIGHTING SONG - Egyptian Revolution


Egyptian Revolution 2011 COMPLETE



news WikiLeaks: U.S. Government Behind Egypt Revolution?

By DJ Pangburn Friday, February 04, 2011


The Telegraph is reporting that WikiLeaks documents suggest the Egyptian revolution was encouraged by a U.S. government that was still publicly propping up Mubarak’s regime. Is there truth in the suggestion?

The Telegraph article makes the assertion that the U.S. government is fully behind the Egyptian revolution and that the WikiLeaks documents prove it.

It wouldn’t be particularly surprising if the U.S. government or the CIA were meddling in Egypt, but it would be rather curious in light of the fact the U.S. government spends about $1.5 billion annually on Mubarak’s regime, propping him up for 30 years, thereby creating somewhat of a peaceful buffer in the Middle East for our protectorate Israel.

The WikiLeaks documents reveal a secret U.S. communique from the Embassy in Cairo to Washington in 2008, in which an anonymous Egyptian dissident is discussed relative to his participation in the April 6th Youth Movement of that year.

Would it not be counter-intuitive for the U.S. government to keep funding Mubarak while they secretly explore options of deposing the Egyptian dictator? If not, what does the U.S. stand to gain if it loses an ally in its fight against Al Qaeda and Muslim extremists?

While it might be baffling, this is not the first time our government has sought to bring down one of our puppet dictators (see: Manuel Noriega). Did the human and civil rights abuses become just too much for the U.S. to ignore?

According to the WikiLeaks documents, the anonymous dissident (call him ‘X’), attended the Alliance of Youth Movements Summit. The Alliance’s mission, as stated on their website is:
    “Movements.org is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to helping grassroots activists to build their capacity and make a greater impact on the world. Through the use of new technologies, grassroots activists have more capacity than ever to make change in their communities. Yet wired social movements continue to grapple with the challenges of scaling and sustaining themselves over time.”
The Alliance is sponsored by the U.S. Department of State, Facebook, Google, Pepsi, MSNBC and the Columbia Law School, among others. So, it would seem the Telegraph is correct in making the connection between X and the U.S. government by way of the State Department.

It should be noted that George W. Bush was President at the time of X’s interaction with the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and with “his subsequent meetings with USG officials, on Capitol Hill, and with think tanks.”

How does an Egyptian dissident have such high-level contact with officials at embassies, in Washington and with various un-named think tanks? Who spoke to X? Who are the think tanks? Why was X meeting with U.S. officials even as the U.S. was publicly supporting Mubarak’s regime?

After X returned from the Alliance summit, Egypt’s State Security (SSIS) detained him and confiscated his notes from the summit meeting and his ‘schedule for his congressional meetings.’ X was meeting with members of Congress? Something’s not right here.

The secret documents note that X recommended regime change because Mubarak would not “undertake significant reform.”

The following sentence is the most telling, however, with the Embassy officials stating, “He alleged that several opposition parties and movements have accepted an unwritten plan for democratic transition by 2011; we are doubtful of this claim.”

The notes go on to say, “April 6′s stated goal of replacing the current regime with a parliamentary democracy prior to the 2011 presidential elections is highly unrealistic, and is not supported by the mainstream opposition.”

So, the U.S. government is courting X but doesn’t believe that a democratic transition could be pulled off in 2011.

Fast forward approximately two years and this a very real possibility in Egypt. Which is more probable: X and other dissidents went ahead without U.S. government support in the January uprising, or the U.S. government has always been involved? Maybe U.S. officials changed their tune after the initial doubt highlighted in this document.

One of the more interesting comments made by X is paraphrased in the secret document:
    “[X] asserted that Mubarak derives his legitimacy from U.S. support, and therefore charged the U.S. with ‘being responsible’ for Mubarak’s ‘crimes.’”
X: calling it like it is.

But, roughly two years passed between the date of this secret document detailing X’s thoughts on an Egyptian democratic revolution and this year’s January uprising. Did U.S. eventually support dissidents like X?

A recent televised report on Al Jazeera had youth activists claiming U.S. support was irrelevant.

This isn’t proof of U.S. involvement as the Telegraph suggests, but it certainly makes one wonder if they’ve been behind the scenes manipulating events.
-----
    Egypt protests: secret US document discloses support for protesters

    Here is the secret document sent from the US Embassy in Cairo to Washington disclosing the extent of American support for the protesters behind the Egypt uprising.
    10:30PM GMT 28 Jan 2011

    S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 CAIRO 002572 SIPDIS FOR NEA/ELA, R, S/P

    AND H NSC FOR PASCUAL AND KUTCHA-HELBLING E.O. 12958: DECL:

    12/30/2028 TAGS: PGOV, PHUM, KDEM, EG SUBJECT: APRIL 6 ACTIVIST ON HIS

    U.S. VISIT AND REGIME CHANGE IN EGYPT REF: A. CAIRO 2462 B.

    CAIRO 2454 C. CAIRO 2431 Classified By: ECPO A/Mincouns

    Catherine Hill-Herndon for reason 1.4 (d ). 1. (C) Summary and

    comment: On December 23, April 6 activist xxxxxxxxxxxx expressed

    satisfaction with his participation in the December 3-5 \"Alliance of

    Youth Movements Summit,\" and with his subsequent meetings with USG

    officials, on Capitol Hill, and with think tanks. He described how

    State Security (SSIS) detained him at the Cairo airport upon his

    return and confiscated his notes for his summit presentation calling

    for democratic change in Egypt, and his schedule for his Congressional

    meetings. xxxxxxxxxxxx contended that the GOE will never undertake

    significant reform, and therefore, Egyptians need to replace the

    current regime with a parliamentary democracy. He alleged that

    several opposition parties and movements have accepted an unwritten

    plan for democratic transition by 2011; we are doubtful of this claim.

    xxxxxxxxxxxx said that although SSIS recently released two April 6

    activists, it also arrested three additional group members. We have

    pressed the MFA for the release of these April 6 activists. April 6's

    stated goal of replacing the current regime with a parliamentary

    democracy prior to the 2011 presidential elections is highly

    unrealistic, and is not supported by the mainstream opposition. End

    summary and comment. ---------------------------- Satisfaction with

    the Summit ---------------------------- 2. (C) xxxxxxxxxxxx expressed

    satisfaction with the December 3-5 \"Alliance of Youth Movements

    Summit\" in New York, noting that he was able to meet activists from

    other countries and outline his movement's goals for democratic change

    in Egypt. He told us that the other activists at the summit were very

    supportive, and that some even offered to hold public demonstrations

    in support of Egyptian democracy in their countries, with xxxxxxxxxxxx

    as an invited guest. xxxxxxxxxxxx said he discussed with the other

    activists how April 6 members could more effectively evade harassment

    and surveillance from SSIS with technical upgrades, such as

    consistently alternating computer \"simcards.\" However, xxxxxxxxxxxx

    lamented to us that because most April 6 members do not own computers,

    this tactic would be impossible to implement. xxxxxxxxxxxx was

    appreciative of the successful efforts by the Department and the

    summit organizers to protect his identity at the summit, and told us

    that his name was never mentioned publicly. ------------------- A

    Cold Welcome Home ------------------- 3. (S) xxxxxxxxxxxx told us

    that SSIS detained and searched him at the Cairo Airport on December

    18 upon his return from the U.S. According to xxxxxxxxxxxx, SSIS

    found and confiscated two documents in his luggage: notes for his

    presentation at the summit that described April 6's demands for

    democratic transition in Egypt, and a schedule of his Capitol Hill

    meetings. xxxxxxxxxxxx described how the SSIS officer told him that

    State Security is compiling a file on him, and that the officer's

    superiors instructed him to file a report on xxxxxxxxxxxx most recent

    activities. --------------------------------------------- ----------

    Washington Meetings and April 6 Ideas for Regime Change

    --------------------------------------------- ---------- 4. (C)

    xxxxxxxxxxxx described his Washington appointments as positive, saying

    that on the Hill he met with xxxxxxxxxxxx, a variety of House staff

    members, including from the offices of xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx),

    and with two Senate staffers. xxxxxxxxxxxx also noted that he met

    with several think tank members. xxxxxxxxxxxx said that xxxxxxxxxxxx's

    office invited him to speak at a late January Congressional hearing on

    House Resolution 1303 regarding religious and political freedom in

    Egypt. xxxxxxxxxxxx told us he is interested in attending, but

    conceded he is unsure whether he will have the funds to make the trip.

    He indicated to us that he has not been focusing on his work as a

    \"fixer\" for journalists, due to his preoccupation with his U.S.

    trip. 5. (C) xxxxxxxxxxxx described how he tried to convince his

    Washington interlocutors that the USG should pressure the GOE to

    implement significant reforms by threatening to reveal CAIRO 00002572

    002 OF 002 information about GOE officials' alleged \"illegal\"

    off-shore bank accounts. He hoped that the U.S. and the international

    community would freeze these bank accounts, like the accounts of

    Zimbabwean President Mugabe's confidantes. xxxxxxxxxxxx said he wants

    to convince the USG that Mubarak is worse than Mugabe and that the GOE

    will never accept democratic reform. xxxxxxxxxxxx asserted that

    Mubarak derives his legitimacy from U.S. support, and therefore

    charged the U.S. with \"being responsible\" for Mubarak's \"crimes.\"

    He accused NGOs working on political and economic reform of living in

    a \"fantasy world,\" and not recognizing that Mubarak -- \"the head of

    the snake\" -- must step aside to enable democracy to take root. 6.

    (C) xxxxxxxxxxxx claimed that several opposition forces -- including

    the Wafd, Nasserite, Karama and Tagammu parties, and the Muslim

    Brotherhood, Kifaya, and Revolutionary Socialist movements -- have

    agreed to support an unwritten plan for a transition to a

    parliamentary democracy, involving a weakened presidency and an

    empowered prime minister and parliament, before the scheduled 2011

    presidential elections (ref C). According to xxxxxxxxxxxx, the

    opposition is interested in receiving support from the army and the

    police for a transitional government prior to the 2011 elections.

    xxxxxxxxxxxx asserted that this plan is so sensitive it cannot be

    written down. (Comment: We have no information to corroborate that

    these parties and movements have agreed to the unrealistic plan

    xxxxxxxxxxxx has outlined. Per ref C, xxxxxxxxxxxx previously told us

    that this plan was publicly available on the internet. End comment.)

    7. (C) xxxxxxxxxxxx said that the GOE has recently been cracking down

    on the April 6 movement by arresting its members. xxxxxxxxxxxx noted

    that although SSIS had released xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx \"in the

    past few days,\" it had arrested three other members. (Note: On

    December 14, we pressed the MFA for the release of xxxxxxxxxxxx and

    xxxxxxxxxxxx, and on December 28 we asked the MFA for the GOE to

    release the additional three activists. End note.) xxxxxxxxxxxx

    conceded that April 6 has no feasible plans for future activities.

    The group would like to call for another strike on April 6, 2009, but

    realizes this would be \"impossible\" due to SSIS interference,

    xxxxxxxxxxxx said. He lamented that the GOE has driven the group's

    leadership underground, and that one of its leaders, xxxxxxxxxxxx, has

    been in hiding for the past week. 8. (C) Comment: xxxxxxxxxxxx

    offered no roadmap of concrete steps toward April 6's highly

    unrealistic goal of replacing the current regime with a parliamentary

    democracy prior to the 2011 presidential elections. Most opposition

    parties and independent NGOs work toward achieving tangible,

    incremental reform within the current political context, even if they

    may be pessimistic about their chances of success. xxxxxxxxxxxx

    wholesale rejection of such an approach places him outside this

    mainstream of opposition politicians and activists.

    SCOBEY02008-12-307386PGOV,PHUM,KDEM,EGAPRIL 6 ACTIVIST ON HIS U.S.

    VISIT AND REGIME CHANGE IN EGYPT

Shattering the American Illusion


    Shattering the American Illusion
    The Revolution in Egypt is a geopolitical game changer
Source: http://www.adbusters.org/blogs/adbusters-blog/american-illusions-shattered.html

F
or over half a century, America has been celebrated as the land of liberty whose foreign policy is synonymous with promoting freedom and democracy. But now, in the wake of WikiLeaks and the people’s revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt, we finally have confirmation of what many of us have long suspected: America is no longer living up to its noble promise. We know now that for years, America has been giving millions of dollars of military aid to the Tunisian government, a regime that America’s own ambassador called, in a leaked diplomatic cable, “a police state, with little freedom of expression or association, and serious human rights problems.” [1] Likewise, in Egypt, America has provided billions of dollars of mostly military aid to a government known to use torture, as another leaked cable testifies: “torture and police brutality in Egypt are endemic and widespread” and “there are literally hundreds of torture incidents every day in Cairo police stations alone.”[2] Worse still, is the evidence that Egypt tortured individuals on America’s behalf as part of the CIA’s illegal rendition program. [3]

The rhetoric of democracy can no longer hide from the world the reality of what America has become: not a bastion of liberty, but a disgraced state and anti-democratic supporter of tyrants. We are now entering a post-American era. Global geopolitics will never be the same. Can America get back on track?

1. http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2009/07/09TUNIS492.html
2. http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2009/01/09CAIRO79.html
3. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article511059.ece
    US agents ‘kidnapped militant’ for torture in Egypt
Stephen Grey, Milan

ITALIAN police are investigating allegations that American intelligence agents kidnapped an Islamic militant in Milan and transported him to Egypt, where he was tortured.

Osama Moustafa Nasr, an Egyptian dissident with alleged links to Al-Qaeda, disappeared in Milan on February 16, 2003, after eyewitnesses saw him being approached by three men as he walked to a mosque.

A kidnap inquiry was opened in Italy after Nasr, also known as Abu Omar, was temporarily released from custody in Egypt last year and telephoned his wife and friends to tell them what had happened.

He claimed he had been tortured so badly by secret police in Cairo that he had lost hearing in one ear. Italian officers who intercepted the call believe he has since been rearrested.

Although details of the inquiry remain confidential, the Italians are thought to be investigating claims that Nasr was taken by US intelligence agents to Aviano airbase and flown to Egypt in an American plane.

If confirmed, the case would be one of the most controversial instances of the American policy of “rendition” — sending prisoners for imprisonment and questioning in other countries. Since September 11, 2001, dozens of prisoners have been transferred by America to countries such as Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia where interrogation techniques may be harsh.

As The Sunday Times disclosed last November, US agents have repeatedly used civilian executive jets to transport prisoners to the Middle East, including a Gulfstream that was a frequent visitor to British airports. The plane was sold two days after the Sunday Times article appeared.

Imam Imad, the head of Viale Jenner mosque in Milan, an alleged centre of Islamic militancy, said Nasr had described how he tried to resist as he was stopped in the street and forced into a car before being taken to a military base.

“He can’t be sure if it was the Italians or Americans who took him,” Imad said. “He was blindfolded. But they were western people. It was certainly not the Egyptians who captured him and took him to Cairo.”

Armando Spataro, the deputy chief prosecutor of Milan, would not confirm whether there was any evidence of US involvement but said he was conducting a far-reaching inquiry. If Americans had played a part, “it would be a serious breach of Italian law”.

Spataro and other Italian prosecutors are particularly angry about Nasr’s disappearance because they were preparing to prosecute him in Milan. They had bugged a conversation that appeared to suggest he was colluding in the establishment of a new terrorist network in Europe.

The CIA and other US government departments refuse to discuss rendition publicly, except to insist that all transfers are conducted legally. Privately officials say they have guarantees that prisoners sent to other countries are well treated.

Michael Scheuer, a former senior CIA official who once played a leading role in the hunt for Osama Bin Laden, has confirmed that the agency has been involved in the rendition of close to 100 terror suspects.

The policy of “capturing people and taking them to second or third countries” was developed after the CIA was told to dismantle terrorist cells across the world, said Scheuer, who resigned last November.

Barbara Olshansky, a lawyer for the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York, said the rendition policy was a clear violation of the United Nations Convention Against Torture, which is incorporated into American law and bans the transfer of prisoners to countries where torture is likely.

Official documents released recently in Sweden revealed that the CIA provided a Gulfstream jet that took two Egyptian terrorist suspects from Sweden to Cairo in December 2001. Both claimed they were brutally tortured.

Stephen Grey presents a report on rendition on Radio 4’s File on 4 on Tuesday