Thursday, December 16, 2010

Jail made me more angry, says defiant Assange

Sourcce: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/wikileaks/jail-made-me-more-angry-says-defiant-assange/story-fn775xjq-1225972690078


JULIAN Assange said today his nine days in solitary confinement in a British jail had made him angrier than ever and steeled his resolve to continue the WikiLeaks project.

"It has not altered my position, in fact it has confirmed my position to me personally that we are on the right path," he said on his release.

"It has given me enough anger about the situation to last me 100 years."

His strong rhetoric came just moments before entering the plush Ellingham Hall, his place of "mansion arrest" in the British countryside, after being granted conditional bail at the High Court in London.

Mr Assange is fighting extradition to Sweden over sexual assault allegations made by two women but said his major fear was being handed over to US authorities.

The 39-year-old Australian has become a hate figure in Washington over his website's release of thousands of secret US diplomatic cables containing embarrassing revelations.

"I do not have too many fears about being extradited to Sweden," he said.

"I have much bigger concerns about being extradited to the United States."

"We had a rumour today from my lawyer in the United States that there has been an indictment made against me in the United States. I have not had that confirmed."

Looking tired after being locked up for 23-and-a-half hours a day at Wandsworth Prison for the past week and a half, he said the US administration's attempts to bring down him and the WikiLeaks website were out of line.

"I think it is clear it is not a path that is acceptable to the world community," he said.

"Certainly not acceptable to the people of Australia or the people of Great Britain and to a large degree, not acceptable the people of Sweden as well, although the administrators are a different matter."

After being shut off from the world in jail, Mr Assange was informed he had a "good internet connection" to work with at the 10-bedroom residence owned by independent journalism campaigner and supporter Vaughan Smith.

"We have seen in my week away, my team is robust and we continue to publish in a successful manner ... that is not to underestimate the risks associated to all of us," Mr Assange said.

He is due back in court on January 11 for a case management session, with February 7 and 8 set down for his extradition hearing.

---------------------
    Julian Assange released, vows Wikileaks to fight on
Peter Wilson, Europe correspondent

Source: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/julian-assange-released-vows-wikileaks-to-fight-on/story-e6frg6so-1225972511111



JULIAN Assange strode to freedom on the steps of the High Court in London and vowed his WikiLeaks website would fight on.

The 39-year-old Australian was released after nine days in the Victorian-era Wandsworth prison when the High Court said he should be granted bail while he resists extradition to Sweden on sex abuse allegations that he claims are a crude attempt to silence him.

After a day of uncertainty about his fate, Mr Assange and his legal team walked outside the court yesterday into a light snow storm on The Strand to address about 200 journalists from around the world.

"It's great to smell the fresh air of London again," he said.

"First, some thankyous. To all the people around the world who have had faith in me, who have supported my team while I have been away.

"To my lawyers, who have put up a brave and ultimately successful fight, to our sureties (bail guarantors) and people who have provided money in the face of great difficulty and aversion.

"And to members of the press who are not all taken in, and considered to look deeper in their work.

"And I guess finally, to the British justice system itself, where if justice is not always the outcome at least it is not dead yet.

"During my time in solitary confinement in the bottom of a Victorian prison I had time to reflect on the conditions of those people around the world also in solitary confinement, also on remand, in conditions that are more difficult than those faced by me.

"Those people also need your attention and support.

"And with that I hope to continue my work and continue to protest my innocence in this matter and to reveal, as we get it, which we have not yet, the evidence from these allegations."

Justice Duncan Ouseley rejected an appeal against Mr Assange's bail by Swedish authorities, who claimed if he was set free he might flee rather than face charges in Sweden that he allegedly committed four sex offences against two women in what began as consensual sexual encounters.

Justice Ouseley said one reason he believed Mr Assange was unlikely to abscond was that the allegations against him in Sweden did not seem to be "a cast iron case... so he has some prospects of success".

Evidence that one Swedish prosecutor felt there was no case against Mr Assange before another prosecutor disagreed and decided to pursue the matter suggested that the case "would be one that could be resisted by an innocent man," said Justice Ouseley.

Mr Assange denies the allegations of sexual abuse and insists the Swedish prosecution is a politically motivated attempt to stop his website from revealing US government secrets.

The internet publisher's release was delayed by a scramble to meet the court's demand for a £200,000 ($316,000) security payment and sureties from seven people who were prepared to stake their reputations and up to £20,000 of their own money on their confidence Mr Assange would not skip bail.

Mr Assange's legal team raced throughout the afternoon to meet those conditions before the close of business so their client would not be sent back for another night in solitary confinement, where he has been constantly monitored by infra-red cameras.

The providers of sureties included Australian journalist Phillip Knightley, publishing tycoon Felix Dennis, Nobel laureate for medicine Sir John Sulston, former British Labour spokesman on justice in the House of Lords Matthew Evans and academic Professor Patricia David.

The judge said he was worried that many of the people who had offered to back Mr Assange did not know him personally and were motivated by their support for his work with Wikileaks fighting for freedom of speech.

That raised the risk they might feel it would be "a righteous act" for Mr Assange to skip bail in order to continue his Wikileaks work, the judge said.

The judge's solution was to accept stringent bail conditions and a mix of sureties from the public figures who backed Mr Assange and from two personal friends, caterer Sarah Saunders and Vaughan Smith, a club owner in whose country estate Mr Assange will be obliged to live during his extradition hearings.

Mr Assange will have to wear an electronic tag and observe curfews of 12 hours each day while staying at Ellingham Hall, the mansion on Mr Smith's 600-acre property in Suffolk.

Mr Smith's home has ten bedrooms which are often rented out to visitors and members of hunting parties. Mr Assange will be paying for his lodgings and board, according to Mr Smith.

Mr Assange will have to report to police each day and he has surrendered his passport

The Obama Administration has made it clear it wants to take legal action against Mr Assange and his website, and it has been considering charges under the 1917 Espionage Act or other laws relating to his role in obtaining and publishing massive cashes of stolen US government cables.

Bradley Manning, a junior US military analyst, is in custody for having leaked the confidential cables and the Department of Justice is examining ways of linking Mr Assange to Mr Manning's alleged crimes.

The extradition case will resume on January 11 with two full days of hearings set down in early February. Legal experts say a European Arrest Warrant like that used against Mr Assange is highly likely to see him ultimately sent to Sweden but appeals could stretch the matter out for more than a year.



Law not broken by WikiLeaks' publication of US cables

Joe Kelly
Source: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/wikileaks/law-not-broken-by-wikileaks-publication-of-us-cables-afp/story-fn775xjq-1225972735066


THE Australian Federal Police say they have not yet found any breach of Australian law in the leaking of US diplomatic documents published by WikiLeaks.

Attorney-General Robert McClelland said in a statement the government had received advice from the AFP on the matter, after police were asked to determine whether any illegality had occurred.

Mr McClelland noted that, on the information to date, the AFP has “not identified any criminal offences where Australia has jurisdiction and as a result have not commenced an investigation”.

Julia Gillard sparked an intense debate over whether WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange had acted unlawfully after she earlier this month condemned the publishing of embarrassing US cables as “an illegal thing to do”.

Labor MPs in the left-wing parliamentary faction were enraged at the treatment of Mr Assange and demanded the government stop treating him as a criminal and protect his rights as an Australian citizen and whistleblower.

The Prime Minister today said she stood by her remarks, and again branded the publication of the cables “grossly irresponsible”, and repeated that “the theft of those documents is an illegal act”.

Mr McClelland said it had been “prudent” to examine whether any Australian laws had been broken.

“As has previously been stated, given the documents published to date are classified by the United States, the primary jurisdiction for any investigation into the matter remains the United States.

“The government remains extremely concerned about the unauthorised and irresponsible distribution of classified material.”

Mr McClelland warned, however, that the AFP “noted a number of offences which could be applied in the circumstances, depending on whether all the elements of the offence could be proven”.

The government's announcement follows the release on conditional bail in London early today of Mr Assange after nine days in prison.

The Australian founder of WikiLeaks is fighting extradition to Sweden over sexual assault allegations made by two women, but says his major fear is being handed over to authorities in the US, where there is widespread anger over the leaking of thousands of sensitive US diplomatic documents.

Ms Gillard today confirmed the AFP's findings but defended her own rhetoric in response to the publication of the confidential US cables.

The Prime Minister said she wanted to “clear up” what she described as some “conflation of what are different issues”.

She said that the government had made clear that Mr Assange would be provided consular assistance in fighting extradition.

But this was a separate issue to “theft of the documents”, and repeated her claim that “the theft of those documents is an illegal act”.

“That's properly in the hands of the US authorities to deal with,” she said.

Ms Gillard reaffirmed her view that the “release of all of this documentation has been grossly irresponsible and I stand by the remarks that I've made about this previously”.

“Whilst I know that there are times when people are whistleblowers, that is not the circumstance here, in my view, with WikiLeaks.

“This has been a wholesale release of information.

“There are some people who are fans of this conduct but I most certainly am not.

“The other side needs to be put, which is that, you know, I do believe that this conduct is irresponsible conduct.”

Ms Gillard also warned today that it was important not to make the “slip of suggesting that because something was written in a cable, it is a fact”.

She said confidential cables could identify people who provided information to governments who lived under oppressive regime and the publication of such documents could “have consequences”.

Australian revelations in the leaked cables include the fact that key Labor powerbroker and minister Mark Arbib was designated a “protected” US source who provided information on the inside workings of the government to US officials. Many other Labor figures were also designated “protected” sources and it is understood that the designation is simply given to ensure that information provided by these sources is not shared with other countries.

The cables also revealed the deep concerns held by the then prime minister Kevin Rudd over the international strategy in Afghanistan in 2008, sparking questions about whether these concerns should have been made public.

The cables also revealed that the former prime minister had warned the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in March 2009 that the world must be prepared to use force if Beijing could not be successfully integrated into the international community and that he was a “brutal realist on China”.


Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Aussie launches 'business version of WikiLeaks'

By Jane Lee
Source: http://www.news.com.au/business/business-owner/aussie-launches-business-version-of-wikileaks/story-e6frfm5i-1225972128310
    * Aussie retailer launches Tradeleaks.com
    * Users post anonymous tips about dodgy firms
    * Information on website is unreliable, says critic
AN AUSTRALIAN online electronics retailer has launched what he calls the business world's answer to WikiLeaks.

The site, Tradeleaks.com, allows internet users to post documents and tip-offs about dodgy business practices anonymously. Users can then rate and comment on the reliability of each leak.

Twenty-eight year old Ruslan Kogan, who featured on this year's BRW Young Rich list with a wealth of $29 million, made Tradeleaks.com available this morning.

A few hours after the website went live, there were ten allegations posted on the site about a mix of businesses and retailers.

'Fan' alleged that Foxtel* has an internal policy to offer one month’s free service to customers calling to "disconnect" their cable TV subscription.

Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
Related Coverage

* Inflation: Expectations fall

End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
Business Owner Amex promo driver

Anonymous claimed that in his or her experience working at a "big TV retailer", he or she will: "play with the color (sic) settings on the TVs to ensure that the TVs that will earn us the most commission look better than the others."

"MY ADVICE TO CONSUMERS: If you are ever in a store buying a TV, ensure that you set all the color settings to "Factory Default" when comparing," said the post.

Mr Kogan said he hoped the site would eventually be filled with trade secrets and eventually become "bigger than WikiLeaks."

Mr Kogan denied that the website is an attempt to grab publicity for himself and his other businesses: "Someone could go on and post something [negative] about Kogan or my other business interests - we’re going to be judged on our transparency too… if it was [a publicity stunt] we’d put the Kogan logo on it."

"It's going to create a better shopping environment for consumers," Mr Kogan said.

"What this does is put all of the [internet’s business rumours and tip-offs] in one place; you're giving people one central place to say: 'I've worked here and here and they made me do this behind closed doors'," he said.

Mr Kogan said users can "post a leak" on the site directly in a system that will regulate itself, amid critics' warnings that there is no guarantee the information posted on the site is true or that its users’ personal details will be protected.

The site, which does not require a user name or evidence to back up claims, asks only that people "post credible information, including source documents where possible, which they believe consumers need to know."

"We put the power in the consumers’ hands, we let people decide what’s relevant and what’s not, whether they believe it or not..." he said.

"We’re not policing it and will only remove posts if they’re defamatory…you can post anything you want."

Asked what sort of security the site provided tipsters, Mr Kogan replied: “We’ve got legal firms and teams and we won't put up with personal attacks on anyone.

"We're encouraging people to provide evidence about claims - whatever they have we encourage them to upload it."

'This is no WikiLeaks'

Paul Ducklin, the head of technology for technical support firm Sophos' Asia-Pacific region, said that the website is no different to millions of existing internet forums that expose businesses to the risk of being slandered and their users to the risk of being identified.

"It is possible in all of this that innocent people could get slandered or libelled," Mr Ducklin said.

He contrasted Tradeleaks with WikiLeaks, which has a team of experts that decide when and whether to publish confidential information it has obtained.

"You have absolutely no idea who’s behind [the information on Tradeleaks], no indication of what’s going up and what’s not, there is no privacy policy," said Mr Ducklin.

"There's almost an anti-guarantee that people can post anything and we’ll publish it.

"[It's almost as if they are saying:] 'We don’t care what it is, we just ask you not to put naughty stuff up and it's up to others to remove it.'"

Saturday, December 11, 2010

CHỐNG CỘNG BẰNG MỒM - LS.Lê Duy San

LS.Lê Duy San

Từ ngày miền Nam Việt Nam bị bọn Cộng Sản miền Bắc thôn tính nốt để áp đặt một chế độ độc ác và dã man có một không hai trên thế giới cho cả nước và khiến cho cả triệu người chúng ta phải bỏ nước ra đi lưu lạc khắp bốn phương trời. Có thể nói đây là quốc nạn, nhưng cũng nhờ đó mà phong trào chống Cộng bùng phát mạnh mẽ hơn lúc nào hết nhất là kể từ khi một số các tiểu bang như Virginia, Texas, California có đông người Việt đến định cư. Không phải chỉ có những chính trị gia, những nhà hoạt động cho nhân quyền, không phải chỉ có những người trí thức, những công thương kỹ nghệ gia, mà cả những ông gìa, bà cả, những em học sinh tiểu học, trung học cũng tham gia.

Nhưng nước đã mất, quân đội đã tan hàng, tiền bạc, súng đạn thì không có, chúng ta chỉ còn có cái MIỆNG. Vậy chúng ta chống Cộng bằng gì ? Những cuộc biểu tình đả đảo Cộng Sản, hội thảo, hội luận hay viết bài tố cáo sự vi phạm nhân quyền hay tội ác của Cộng Sản đăng tải trên báo chí hay đưa lên nét, nếu không có cái MIỆNG thì chúng ta làm sao để bầy tỏ? Thể hiện tất cả các điều đó, chính là chúng ta đã thể hiện những quyền tự do ngôn luận, tự do báo chí, tự do hội họp, tự do tư tửơng v.v…tức là chúng ta đã mở một mặt trận cuối cùng để chống lại bọn Cộng Sản VN, đó là MẶT TRẬN VĂN HÓA. Nhưng tiếc thay, một số người vô ý thức, trong đó có cả những kẻ đã ăn cơm quốc gia hay ít nhất thì bố mẹ chúng đã được hưởng nhiều ân sủng của chế độ Việt Nam Cộng Hòa mà chúng mới có được những địa vị như ngày hôm nay, đã mỉa mai gọi những người chống Cộng như vậy là CHỐNG CỘNG BẰNG MỒM.

Chính vì sự chống Cộng bằng MỒM của chúng ta mà bọn Cộng Sản Việt Nam đi đến đâu cũng phải trốn lui, trốn lủi, phải luồn cửa hông, phải chui cửa hậu, phải nhờ cảnh sát Mỹ bảo vệ. Chính vì sự chống Cộng bằng MỒM của chúng ta mà cờ MÁU của bọn Cộng Sản Việt Nam, ngoi lên được cái nào là bị giật bỏ cái đó, trái lại, cờ VÀNG ba sọc đỏ của chúng ta thì không những luôn luôn được đồng bào chúng ta trang trọng giương cao và càng ngày càng nhiều. Ngay cả một số những người đã và đang sống dưới chế độ Cộng Sản Việt Nam và cả những người đã từng là đảng viên Cộng Sản VN cũng mong muốn một ngày nào đó, ngọn cờ vàng ba sọc đỏ của chúng ta sẽ tung bay trở lại trên bầu trời Việt Nam. Chính vì vậy mà ngụy quyền Cộng Sản Việt Nam phải đề ra Nghị Quyết 36 để chống lại.

Đọc qua bản Nghị Quyết này, chúng ta nhận thấy ngụy quyền Cộng Sản Việt Nam đã đánh gía “rất cao” người Việt tỵ nạn Cộng Sản mà chúng khôn ngoan gọi là “người ViệtNam ở nước ngoài”. Chúng không những đã chỉ thị cho các cơ quan, các tổ chức của chúng ở hải ngoại cũng như ở trong nước phải phối hợp chặt chẽ với nhau dụ dỗ người Việt Hải Ngoại về giúp nước hoặc làm ăn buôn bán với bọn chúng mà còn phải có biện pháp đấu tranh với “những biểu hiện cố tình đi ngược lại lợi ích dân tộc”.

“Những biểu hiện cố tình đi ngược lại lợi ích dân tộc” ở đây là gi ? Đó chính là những hành động chống đối bọn chúng của chúng ta như biểu tình, mít ting, hội luận, hội thảo để chống đối bọn chúng cũng như những bài tham luận, bình luận phê bình chỉ trích bọn chúng trên đài phát thanh, trên vô tuyến truyền hình hoặc trên diễn đàn internet hay những sự chống đối, phản kháng của người dân bằng những bài thơ, câu vè, những câu chuyện tiếu lâm. Tóm lại đó là tất cả những gì mà bọn người vô ý thức, bọn ViệtGian Công Sản và bọn Cộng Sản nằm vùng gọi là “CHỐNG CỘNG BẰNG MỒM”.

Còn biện pháp đấu tranh của bọn chúng là gì ? Sở trường của bọn Cộng Sản VN là xâm nhập để lèo lái; nếu không được thì xúc xiểm để chia rẽ và mua chuộc. Cả hai phương pháp này, đối với Việt Cộng đều qúa dễ bởi vì các đảng phái, đoàn thể và hội đoàn của người Việt tỵ nan Cộng Sản ở hải ngoại đều qúa lỏng lẻo, tài chánh thì lại không có. Người có khả năng, có uy tín thì phần lớn lại không muốn xuất đầu lộ diện vì sợ bị chụp mũ, bị bôi nhọ. Hội đoàn nào cũng phải tự đóng góp và sống nhờ vào các Mạnh Thường Quân. Báo chí, truyền thông cũng vậy, phải sống nhờ vào quảng cáo. Mạnh Thường Quân mà không có, Quảng Cáo mà ít thì rất dễ lọt vào tay Cộng Sản hoạc bị bọn chúng lèo lái bởi vì tiền bạc thì bọn chúng nhiều, mà bọn Việt Gian Cộng Sản ham danh hỗ trợ bọn chúng lại không ít. Vì thế chúng ta không lấy làm lạ khi thấy nhiều hội đoàn bị chia rẽ và có khi còn bị tách làm đôi. Nam Cali, một hồi chúng ta đã thấy có hai Cộng Đồng. Hết Nam Cali nay lại tới Bắc Cali, cũng có hai Cộng Đồng, hai hội Ái Hữu Đồng Hương Quảng Ngãi v.v… Cái lưu manh của bọn Cộng Sản là không bao giờ xuất đầu lộ diện trừ phi bị lộ tẩy. Chúng chuyên môn khích bác người này, xúc xiểm người kia. Nếu chúng có viết bài đưa lên nét hay lên báo chí thì cũng chỉ đề bút hiệu hoặc tên giả, không bao giờ dám để tên thật cho nên chúng không ngần ngại dùng những ngôn từ của kẻ vô học để chỉ trích người khác. Nhưng có lúc chúng cũng tỏ ra rất lịch sự và khách quan, làm cho người đọc, nếu không theo dõi ngay từ đầu, thật khó biết chúng thuộc hạng người nào, Quốc Gia hay Cộng Sản. Chúng tung hỏa mù để chúng ta không còn biết đường nào mà đánh, không còn biết ai là chánh, ai là tà, làm cho chúng ta nhiều khi đang chống Cộng trở thành chống lẫn nhau.

Nhưng dù sao ở hải ngoại, bọn chúng cũng chỉ là thiểu số, chúng lại không có quyền bắt ai, giam ai một cách vô cớ như chúng đã làm ở trong nước. Chính vì sợ cha Lý chống Cộng bằng MỒM mà bọn Cộng Sản Việt Nam đã phải bịt miệng cha Lý ngay tại phiên toà tại Huế ngày 30/3/07. Chính vì sợ chúng ta chống Cộng bằng MỒM mà bọn Cộng Sản Việt Nam đã phải mở cả một MẶT TRẬN VĂN HOÁ bằng nghị Quyết 36 để xâm nhập vào các hội đoàn, các đoàn thể, các cơ quan truyền thông, báo chí, các diễn đàn v.v… để gây chia rẽ và phá hoại. Chưa đủ, chúng còn phải cho bọn tay sai, bọn Việt Gian Cộng Sản gọi những CHIẾN SĨ đang chiến đấu trong MẶT TRẬN VĂN HÓA CHỐNG CỘNG là những người CHỐNG CỘNG BẰNG MỒM.

Vì vậy, chúng ta không việc gì phải sợ, phải xấu hổ (mắc cở) hay khó chịu khi có những kẻ vô ý thức và bọn bưng bô cho Việt Cộng bằng mồm đã gọi chúng ta là những người CHỐNG CỘNG BẰNG MỒM, mà trái lại, chúng ta phải hãnh diện về mấy chữ đó vì NHỮNG NGƯỜI CHỐNG CỘNG BẰNG MỒM chính là NHỮNG CHIẾN SĨ BIỆT KÍCH TRONG MẶT TRẬN VĂN HÓA CHỐNG CỘNG. Còn bọn chúng mới chính là bọn bưng bô cho Cộng Sản bằng mồm.

LS.Lê Duy San